Revdoku vs Tilda
Revdoku publishes sites an AI or developer has already created. Tilda is a hosted visual website builder based on pre-designed blocks and a Zero Block editor. One is open-ended static hosting; the other is a managed design system.
Tilda’s current Free plan advertises one website, 50 pages, 100 block types, and 50 MB of storage. Older references to 170 free blocks should not be treated as the current plan description.
Quick comparison
| Capability | Revdoku | Tilda |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | AI-created custom static sites, files, and microsites | Visually assembled marketing pages and small sites |
| First publish | Public 24-hour preview without signup | Create a Tilda account and build in its editor |
| Free sites | Up to 100 permanent public sites with a Free account | One website |
| Free pages | Determined by files and the 1 GB/site limit | 50 pages |
| Free storage | 5 GB shared; up to 1 GB per website | 50 MB |
| Design workflow | Generate or edit any HTML/CSS/JS, then publish | Tilda blocks and visual editor |
| Custom domain on free tier | One | Not included |
| Branding | No forced sitewide badge | “Made on Tilda” label on Free |
| Forms | Three submissions/day on Revdoku Free | Forms and integrations vary by Tilda plan |
| Free analytics | Not included | Basic site statistics are listed in Tilda’s plan comparison |
Choose Revdoku when
Choose Revdoku when an AI has produced a custom design or interactive static frontend and you want full control over the files. It also offers substantially more storage and free site slots.
Choose Tilda when
Choose Tilda when nontechnical editors want to assemble and revise pages visually from a curated block library without handling files or code.
Key difference
Tilda is the editor and host together. Revdoku hosts the result produced elsewhere, including by an AI. Choose Tilda for its visual authoring experience and Revdoku for publishing freedom.
Sources checked
Compare more website hosting options.