Revdoku vs MDB GO
Revdoku focuses on publishing static sites and files from AI tools. MDB GO combines static hosting, container projects, databases, and a command-line workflow in the MDB ecosystem. Their free limits make sense for different kinds of projects.
This comparison uses MDB GO’s official pricing page, checked on August 15, 2026.
Quick comparison
| Capability | Revdoku | MDB GO |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | AI-created static sites, reports, and microsites | CLI-managed static or container projects |
| First publish | Public 24-hour preview without signup | MDB account and CLI or dashboard workflow |
| Free projects | Free account keeps up to 100 public sites | Two Hobby projects |
| Website lifetime | Permanent after a Free account claims the preview | Static projects persist; Hobby containers have a two-week TTL |
| Free storage | 5 GB shared; up to 1 GB per website | 1 GB SFTP disk per project |
| Container resources | No general container runtime | 500 MB RAM per project |
| Database | Not the focus of this static-hosting comparison | One 500 MB database on Hobby |
| Default address | Randomized revdoku.site |
mdbgo.io project address |
| Custom domain on free tier | One | Listed with SSL on MDB GO Professional, not Hobby |
| Free analytics | Not included | Verify current dashboard metrics; audience analytics are not highlighted |
Choose Revdoku when
Choose Revdoku when an AI has already generated a static deliverable and you want a public URL without configuring a project. It offers far more permanent public sites in the Free account.
Choose MDB GO when
Choose MDB GO when you use the MDB toolchain, need SFTP access, or want a small container and database during development. Be mindful of the two-week container TTL on Hobby.
Key difference
MDB GO is a developer cloud with static, container, and database resources. Revdoku is the shorter AI-to-website publishing path for files that do not need a server process.
Sources checked
Compare more website hosting options.